個人檔案Ashley & Marie Love the ...相片部落格清單更多 工具 說明

LETTER TO ERIC PHELPS BY THOMAS RICHARD

Before it will disappear from the cyber space like this link:
http://www.spirituallysmart.com/Nelson_Turner.html
Because that would be interesting to read about Nelson Turner, Eric's pastor from TR point of vue...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Letter to Eric Phelps:

Re: Monty Collier

http://www.spirituallysmart.com/letter.html

Subject:
Re: Monty Collier

Date:
3/3/2008 1:28:36 P.M. Eastern Standard Time

From: eric@vaticanassassins.org


Dear Thomas,
This man is no Calvinist.Brother Eric (Phelps)


(Eric Phelps has now flip-flopped
on this statement as well. -TR)


But it seems that Eric Phelps was correct when he stated Monty is no Calvinist. Look at this Reformed Theology message board and you can see Monty does not fit in and has attacked some men on there as well.

http://www.spirituallysmart.com/monty_collier.html

To eric@vaticanassassins.org

From Thomas Richards

Re: Monty Collier

Dear Brother Eric, Actually, Collier is making a name for himself among the reformed theology realm as well. He has made accusations toward people and they are also claiming that Monty is twisting their words and the meanings behind what people teach in their theology. Now he's attaching himself to you and will bring your credibility down even among Calvinists. Here is the forum where you can get a clearer picture of what is taking place: ~Link Here is more of Scott Clark's refutation of Monty ~Link/ Here is Monty doing the same thing with yet another person ~Link I suggest to you Eric that you look at these other sides of the story. Monty according to them is making wrong assessments of their theological teachings. Monty then makes a public video attacking this man, twisting the man's words around just like he did to me. This is another witness who is saying what i said. that he is twisting my words around and bringing false accusations against me. Besides that, What is the second chapter of James about Eric? can you really partake in twisting that chapter around to say "we shouldn't have good works"? or don't need them? James says positively that you must have good works and the Lord Jesus Christ says the same thing. "...can faith save him?" James 2:14 These are tell-tale signs that someone has Christ within them. the devil doesn't care about people.
The Lord initially revealed Himself to me through the first chapter of Proverbs where God says terrible things will happen to those who "...hated knowledge, and did not choose the fear of the LORD:" Proverbs 1:29 Let God be true and every man a liar. God says here it's a choice. In Joshua 24:15 Joshua tells them to CHOOSE who they will serve. God presented it to me in this manner brother Eric right before i became a born again Christian and was instantly delivered from horrible anxiety, foul language, daily pot habit, chain smoking addiction and every other satanic bondage.For 11 years i have been delivered from these things.I cant talk about it unless this truly happened to me that day. God showed me He would laugh at my calamity unless i accepted His offer. "I also will laugh at your calamity; I will mock when your fear cometh;" Proverbs 1:26 BECAUSE "YOU.." "... did not choose the fear of the LORD" 1:29 Thisis the same God I read about all through scripture. "No free Will" doctrine and "eternal security" doctrine totally cast away one's need to fear God. The fear of God will not change anything according to your Calvinist theology. But one of the wisest men who ever lived stated, "The fear of the LORD is a fountain of life, to depart from the snares of death." Why should I fear the Lord if I do not have "free will" and am "once saved always saved"? Logic has nothing to do with salvation. Nothing at all. But according to logic this belief in calvinism is illogical. Have Calvinists wrestled with scriptures via "logic" to turn them into a different meaning? Yes they have. Eric, I will say nothing more of this matter. Only that you have been warned.Monty is an uneducated, self appointed pastor of a church that doesn't exist. Why is he "self appointed"? because he has never gone up through the ranks as taught us by our beloved Apostle Paul. He never subjected himself an thus should be shunned as he has usurped authority even in the Calvinist realm. Montywas promoting the Roman Catholic Malachi Martin and will not stop harassing me. I reject his theology. That should at least make me a heretick and his eyes and he should therefore "reject" me as stated in Titus 3:10 I have done a video on this issue saying I reject their "debate" (Monty and Nelson Turner) and I reject their challenge and their idea of "Christianity". http://youtube.com/watch?v=6MnvzYUkSVM Monty and Nelson initiated all this. If they want a "debate" they have the whole "Arminian" realm to go after. The whole Internet is filled with the debate they desire. If James does not teach a man is saved by Faith and Works one can at least say it could be seen that way and is at the very least a debatable topic. And even if the Jesuits themselves look at that verse and believe it and add it to their doctrines it could be said that they believe a section of the bible. Will they do it? No they don't. I have seen expose' after expose' showing that these criminals have no "good works". Good works are OK Eric, although they will not get someone to heaven unless they have been washed in the blood of Jesus and allow the Lord Jesus to do those good works through us for verily we can do nothing with HIM. Yours in Christ, Thomas Richards
Date of Message: | May 12, 2008

回應

請稍候...
很抱歉,您輸入的回應過長。請縮短您的回應。
您尚未輸入內容,請再試一次。
很抱歉,目前無法新增您的回應,請稍後再試。
若要新增回應,您的父母必須先給您權限。要求權限
您的家長已關閉回應功能。
很抱歉,目前無法刪除您的回應,請稍後再試。
您已超過每日回應上限次數,請於 24 小時後再試一次。
由於系統顯示您可能傳送垃圾郵件給其他使用者,因此您帳號中的回應功能已遭停用。 如果您認為自己帳號遭錯誤停用,請連絡 Windows Live 支援
請完成下列安全檢查,以完成回應。
您輸入的安全檢查字元必須與圖片或音訊中的字元相符。

若要新增回應,請以您的 Windows Live ID 登入 (若您使用 Hotmail、Messenger 或 Xbox LIVE,則您已擁有 Windows Live ID)。登入


沒有 Windows Live ID?註冊

引用通告

此內容的引用通告是:
http://ashleywantsmarie.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!4EB375FF91DDF5E6!1036.trak
引述這則內容的部落格